The Solar-AC FAQ : Heat-driven cooling - absorption, desiccants, Vuilleumier : What desiccants exist and how can they produce a cooling effect? | |
Desiccants are materials with a high tendency to adsorb water. If a
dry desiccant is exposed to the air, it will dehumidify the air, while
the desiccant becomes warm. Eventually the desiccant will become
saturated with water, but it can be "regenerated" by heating.
The most common desiccants are silica gel, calcium chloride (CaCl2), activated carbon, zeolites, lithium chloride (LiCl) and lithium bromide (LiBr). Some desiccants can adsorb other liquids than water. Of interest are liquids which boil at temperatures somewhat below water's freezing point: methanol, ammonia, ethanol, methylene chloride. The most obvious use of desiccants in the HVAC area is to dehumidify intake air. Systems which do this are usually set up as "desiccant wheels". If the heat produced during adsorption is excluded from the conditioned space, this produces a form of cooling effect by removing enthalpy from the air. (Warm dry air has less potential energy in it than warm wet air; if you were to add moisture back into the air using an evaporative cooler, you could produce an open-cycle cooling effect.) A closed-cycle cooling effect can be produced by desiccants, by using their affinity for the working fluid to "draw down" its partial pressure and cause a container of working fluid to boil, absorbing heat from the environment. An open-cycle effect also seems feasible -- a form of evaporative cooling in which humidity is actively added inside the conditioned space, and is simultaneously removed by a desiccant outside the conditioned space. | |
Some desiccant links:NREL desiccant cooling page http://www.nrel.gov/desiccantcool/ | |
The "Zeolite and water" link above is an 8 page paper by Kreussler & Bolz with lots of specific numbers. One concern I have is the volume of zeolite required -- K&B seem to be using about 0.1 to 0.2 cubic meters of zeolite per kWh of cooling power, which is pretty humongous. Is this stuff going to be sort of like handling blocks of styrofoam? And if I wanted to keep my house cool for a day (say, 50 kWh of cool for which I'd usually pay $3 on my electric bill) I'd have to bake, what, 5 or 10 cubic meters of zeolite??? Another concern is the efficiency (a COP of 0.08). A concentrating collector could probably double that efficiency pretty easily, but even a COP of 0.16 is going to require several times more collector area than the solar-electric or ammonia-absorption alternatives, with a sun-to-cooling COP of 0.5 or more. Marc Ringuettefaq@solarmirror.com | |
From the solar-ac archives, re: solid desiccants Calcium chloride is by far the best choice for a desiccant system because of its cheapness, strong affinity for water, and relative ease of regeneration. In contact with metals (even copper), it causes the metals to react with carbon dioxide and corrode, so anything in contact with the wet calcium chloride needs to be made of glass or plastic. Concentrated calcium chloride solutions don't freeze as easily, unlike magnesium chloride brines (another possible desiccant available in vast natural deposits). If you need a solid desiccant, there is a possibility that desiccant materials like calcium chloride might be integrated into cements. I don't know if anyone has tried this, but it should get a look. Cements are, in some cases, pretty porous. Imagine a honeycomb of cement and calcium chloride, extruded through a forming process to form a high surface area material like a honeycomb. Ever hear of desiccant wheels? They are basically this same concept: a ceramic binder with an absorptive material integrated into it. I think the current desiccant wheels are made with titania and cement somehow. The desiccant wheels out there now have very high surface areas, and are quite a piece of technology. But here, I'm talking about a lower-cost, bulk material that would do the job. Then again, there is simply sawdust and calcium chloride: a cheap, high surface area, solid/liquid desiccant. Or, for a purely "organic" approach, it might be possible to integrate the calcium chloride desiccant somehow into the construction of a straw bale houses. The trick would be to find a particular type of straw that would be saturable with calcium chloride, but not loose its strength. Another solid desiccant you might be interested in is activated charcoal. It is interesting in that it is black, and would be ideal in a combined desiccant/solar collector. People have tried solid desiccants with other "working fluids". For example, instead of using water vapor, you can make a desiccant cooling cycle by replacing the water with methanol, ethanol, or methylene chloride. The big advantage: in comparison to water vapor, these working fluids have higher partial pressures. The higher the partial pressure, the higher the heat transfer ratio. A little appreciated fact about boiling heat transfer in all liquids: the heat transfer coefficient depends on the partial pressure of the boiling fluid!! Systems using lithium bromide/water vapor must work with very low pressures (substantially below atmospheric). The result: heat exchanger surfaces must be made very large (that's part of the reason these systems are so expensive). -David Wellsfaq@solarmirror.com | |
Liquid desiccant systems have certain advantages over dry desiccants. One of the biggest is the fact that as the desiccant is heated up to drive off the moisture, significant heat may remain in the hot, dried solution. In the case of solid desiccant systems, such as systems employing solid des= iccant wheels, it is hard to recover this heat. With liquid desiccants,the hot, dried solution may be circulated into a cou= nter-flow heat exchanger, using the heat of the hot and dried solution to p= re-heat the incoming moisture loaded solution. Calcium chloride is a cheap, non-toxic, widely available material that has = certain properties that make it a good candidate for this application. I've got a few tables from my Lange's Handbook of Chemistry that have data = that may be useful. First, I'll take a few points off of the twelfth edition's Table 10-20, "Co= mposition of Aqueous Antifreeze Solutions", which is based on Dow Chemical'= s 1929 data sheet. The (%CaCl2) is percent anhydrous Calcium Chloride. Bag= s typically don't contain pure anhydrous, so keep this in mind. Freezing Point(C) % CaCl2=20=20=20=20 0 (32F) 0 -4.8 (23.4F) 9.2 -9.9 (14.4F) 14.6 -15.6(4.1F) 18.6 -21 (-5.8F) 21.5 -30.8(-34.9F) 26.9 -41.8(-41F) 30.5 The above table shows that the calcium chloride solutions will not freeze, = and this is important. Next, here is some excerpts from Lange's Table 10-25, which shows the humi= dity level above various concentrations of calcium chloride solutions. Dat= a is for 25 C. Humidity %CaCl2 100% 0 95% 9.33 90% 14.95 80% 22.25 70% 27.4 60% 31.73 50% 35.64 40% 39.62 30% 44.36% At very high concentrations, you end up with basically a pure Calcium Chlor= ide Hexahydrate tank. Calcium Chloride Hexahydrate melts at almost room te= mperature, 29.9 C. So, in effect, it could act as its own phase change sto= rage material. As for the heats of reaction, it is generally the case that the heat of dec= omposition of most desiccants is about equal to the heat of boiling of the = water in the desiccant. So, as a "phase change storage material", desiccants are pretty amazing. -David Wellsfaq@solarmirror.com | |
You can store heat in a concentrated LiCl solution. It's also possible to cool with this kind of desiccant using an open-loop system. You might have a 180 F water tank and another tank that's filled with a 180 F 50% LiCl/CaCl2 solution on an average day, and mix them over 5 days to make a 33% solution. Diluting a 50% LiCl solution from 50% to 0% releases 262 Btu/lb of heat... 50 to 33% might release (50-33)/50x262 = 87 Btu/lb, so starting with P pounds of LiCl solution and P pounds of water, 210K = 2P(180-80)+87P makes P = 732 pounds, approximately, ie 2 91 gallon tanks, or 4 8'x12" PVC pipes in a closet. To get cooling, you need to drive an evaporation process. You might have a pipe full of LiCl solution and a pipe full of rocks to act as a "packed column" to absorb water vapor in LiCl, and a pond full of rocks under the slab or outdoors to supply the vapor. Each pound of vapor absorbed releases about 1000 Btu of heat, but should make a similar amount of cooling available. We might turn on a fountain in the house when cooling is needed and trickle some LiCl solution into and circulate house air through the packed column, keeping the house at 50% RH. If the house becomes more humid, we run the column without the fountain. House air exits the column warmer than when it entered, but with less moisture, so the net effect on the house is cooling, because it takes more heat to raise the exit air back to 50% RH than to cool it to 70 F. The heat in the dry return air can be reduced via an air-to-air counterflow heat exchanger (swapping heat with the intake air). Meanwhile, the LiCl solution is getting warmer and more dilute. It might warm from say, 100 to 140 F during the day, as it dilutes from 50 to 25%. These papers have more: "Unglazed collector/regenerator performance for a solar assisted open cycle absorption cooling system" by M. N. A. Hawlader, K. S. Novak, and B. D. Wood of the Center for Energy System Research, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5806 USA, in Solar Energy, Vol. 50, pp 59-73, 1993 and "Effectiveness of heat and mass transfer processes in a packed bed liquid desiccant dehumidifier/regenerator" by Viktoria Martin and D. Yogi Goswami in HVAC&R Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp 21-39, January, 2000 and "A review of liquid desiccant cooling" by Viktoria Oeberg and D. Yogi Goswami, chapter 10 in Advances in Solar Energy, Vol. 12, pp 431-470, 1998, American Solar Energy Society Publishers. Nick Pine Source: http://www.ece.villanova.edu/~nick/usenet/00001775faq@solarmirror.com |
Previous: | What are desiccant wheels? |
Next: | How can I experiment with desiccant cooling? |
|